2023: We’re investigating some presidential candidates’ spending – EFCC

As the campaigns ahead of the 2023 general elections heightens, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission says it is closely monitoring the spending patterns of top politicians and some presidential candidates in order to stop them from using money to influence the electoral process.

EFCC Chairman, Mr Abdulrasheed Bawa, who disclosed this, said the anti-graft agency is being careful not to invite some of them for questioning in order not to be misconstrued as political witch-hunting.

Bawa confirmed that there are a number of petitions already before the commission against some key political figures which the anti-graft agency is critically looking into currently.

Confirming the development on Thursday while featuring at the weekly briefings coordinated by the Presidential Media Team at the State House, Abuja, the EFCC boss said the Petitions Vetting Desk/Committee of EFCC, comprising experienced officers from the Legal Department as well as those trained to investigate such petitions are currently reviewing these petitions with a view to seeing whether they have merits that will warrant prosecution.

He said the EFCC is working on every petition directed to it to establish the veracity of such petition, stressing that the anti-graft agency under his watch is poised to work for the interest of Nigerians without fear or favour.

Asked if EFCC has received any petition against any of the 18 presidential candidates jostling to occupy the presidency by 2023, Bawa simply responded, saying, “My concern is, at this hour, do you want us to start inviting all the presidential candidates to come to our office to make statements? You, the same media, will say it’s politically motivated.

“So, we are not, but we are working behind the scene regarding such petitions we have received to see those that have merits, so that’s why we are not politicizing it.

“That’s another reason why we have what we call Petitions Vetting Desk/Committee made up of experienced officers from the Legal Department as well as those trained to investigate that will review these petitions to see whether they are in line with our own mandate before they will recommend whether they will be prosecuted by the EFCC.”

“There are also benchmarks, so to speak, that guide our procedures, you know, in terms of accepting or rejecting petitions, as we also have criteria which have even been publicised to guide petitioners on the requirements to make a petition to have merit.”