By Emmanuel Kwada
Social media activist Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), has been released from the custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on May 7, 2025, after days of detention. The controversial critic was seen driving alongside his lawyer, Barrister Deji Adeyanju, shortly after his release, sparking widespread reactions online.
VDM, who was arrested on May 2, 2025, at a Guaranty Trust Bank branch in Abuja, hinted that the EFCC charged him with money laundering. He claimed the agency misunderstood his financial activities, alleging that funds they scrutinized were debts he incurred to support charitable causes.
“They thought it was laundering, but they don’t know I’m using debt to do charity,” VDM reportedly stated, though no official confirmation of the charges has been detailed by the EFCC.
They thought it was laundering, but they don’t know I’m using debt to do charity
The EFCC had earlier stated that VDM’s detention followed multiple petitions against him, including allegations of cyberstalking and financial crimes. The agency granted him administrative bail on May 6, but his release was delayed due to challenges in meeting bail conditions, as lamented by Adeyanju, who criticized the EFCC for lack of transparency and alleged procedural irregularities.
Adeyanju, alongside prominent lawyer Femi Falana (SAN), who reportedly made several calls to the EFCC challenging the arrest, played a key role in securing VDM’s release.
The release comes amid ongoing controversies surrounding VDM’s vocal criticisms of institutions, including the EFCC, which he recently accused of corruption
Public outcry, including protests by supporters and condemnation from groups like the Public Interest Lawyers League, also mounted pressure on the EFCC.
The release comes amid ongoing controversies surrounding VDM’s vocal criticisms of institutions, including the EFCC, which he recently accused of corruption. Sources suggest his detention may have been linked to these allegations, though the EFCC maintains it acted on legitimate petitions.
