By Samaila Emmanuel Bzugu
Former Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan has made a poignant call for unity among Nigerians, emphasizing that a prevailing loyalty to ethnic affiliations over national identity is undermining the country’s potential for collective development. Speaking at a recent forum in Effurun, Delta State, Jonathan articulated that a cohesive national identity is essential for Nigeria to progress as a nation.
You are a member of the Nigerian National Assembly, either the Senate or the House of Representatives
Jonathan expressed his concerns regarding the pervasive ethnic affiliations among Nigerians, urging legislators and leaders to think beyond their immediate constituencies. “You are a member of the Nigerian National Assembly, either the Senate or the House of Representatives. You are not a member of the assembly of your people at the state assembly,” he reiterated, underscoring the need for legislators to represent the interests of all Nigerians rather than just their ethnic groups.
During his address, Jonathan lamented that despite over a century since Nigeria’s amalgamation, a unifying national identity remains elusive. He stated, “Nigeria is not the only country with multiple nationalities, but it is a place where people have yet to see themselves as common citizens of one nation.” This perspective, he argued, has led to a fragmented society where development is stunted by divisions along ethnic and regional lines.
Countries with diverse nationalities have managed to overcome these barriers, evolving into unified nations
Jonathan noted that countries with diverse nationalities have managed to overcome these barriers, evolving into unified nations. Until we achieve this transformation and break down these ethnic boundaries, progress will remain elusive,” he stated.
The former president emphasised the critical role of leadership at all levels of government, urging leaders to implement policies and projects that promote unity over short-term praise.
“Under the constitution, it’s straightforward to appoint one minister per state, given there are 36 states. However, it becomes more complex when appointing heads of agencies and parastatals, as this often attracts accusations of favoritism or nepotism,” he explained.
